High Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous writ petition for want of prosecution as the investigation remained inconclusive. The interim order was vacated.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution; the interim order stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6189 of 2019
Petitioner :- Vijyant Kumar Jain And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avnish Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition.
On the instructions received by the learned A.G.A., the investigation has not been concluded till date.
The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
The interim order stands vacated.
Order Date :- 8.9.2021 gp
Vijyant Kumar Jain And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Sadhna Rani Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
