Sumant Kishor and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This order dismisses the writ petition for quashing an FIR as infructuous because the chargesheet had already been submitted by the date of hearing.
This order dismisses the writ petition for quashing an FIR as infructuous because the chargesheet had already been submitted by the date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7567 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sumant Kishor And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ashish Kumar Gaur
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA and learned counsel for the complainant.
Present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the FIR dated 4.5.2021 being Case Crime No.100 of 2021 under Sections 147, 342, 171-E, 120-B IPC & 3 (1) (m), 3 (1) (o) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, P.S. Hassayan, Distt. Hathras and for a direction to respondents not to arrest the petitioners pursuant to aforesaid FIR.
On the matter being taken up today, learned AGA has submitted that in the present matter the chargesheet has been submitted on 30.11.2021 and as such the reliefs claimed in the writ petition no more survives.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 14.12.2021 SP/
Sumant Kishor
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court