Mohit Arora v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been submitted, rendering the petition without purpose.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. The court noted that the charge-sheet had already been submitted, rendering the petition without purpose.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6422 of 2021
Petitioner :- Mohit Arora Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shishir Tandon Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Shashi Dhar Shukla
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
At the very outset, Mrs. Archana Singh, learned AGA-I states that in the present matter charge-sheet has already been submitted on 06.07.2020, as such, the writ petition itself rendered infructuous.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous in terms of the aforesaid.
Order Date :- 1.12.2021 pks
Mohit Arora
State Of U.P.
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court