The High Court held that the writ petition was rendered infructuous because the charge-sheet had already been challenged in a pending application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous on the ground of a pending Section 482 Cr.P.C. application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1558 of 2021
Petitioner :- Sunita Devi Respondent :- State Of U P And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Faizur Rahman Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Ashish Srivastava,Shyam Kumar Verma,Vimal Chandra
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the charge-sheet has already been assailed in an Application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. No.23753 of 2021 (Suneeta Devi Vs. State of U.P. and another), as such, the writ petition itself rendered infructuous.
Learned counsel for the complainant could not dispute the aforesaid position.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous in terms of the aforesaid.
Order Date :- 1.12.2021 pks
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable in light of a pending bail application under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunita Devi
State Of U P
Mahesh Chandra Tripathi
Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
