Rajiv @ Raju v. State of U P and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a criminal miscellaneous writ petition regarding an attachment order under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The court directed the District Judge, Baghpat, to decide the petitioner's pending application under Section 15 of the Act within two months, ensuring a reasonable hearing opportunity.
What did the court decide?
Directed the District Judge, Baghpat to decide the petitioner's representation under Section 15 of the Act within two months after affording reasonable opportunity of hearing.