Petitioner withdrew a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR and directive against arrest. The petition is disposed of with liberty to apply for bail. No opinion on merits was expressed.
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to apply for anticipatory bail or bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4035 of 2021
Petitioner :- Mohd. Shamim Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.G.A.
This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
"A. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned first information report dated 25.02.2021 as case crime No. 45 of 2021 under section 3/5A/8, 5B U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station - Karari, District - Kaushambi (Annexure no. 2 to the writ petition).
B. issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/directing the respondents not to arrest the Petitioner with reference to as case crime No. 45 of 2021 under section 3/5A/8, 5B U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Police Station - Karari, District - Kaushambi (Annexure no. 2 to the writ petition)."
After the arguments were heard at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner wants to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to apply for anticipatory bail/ bail.
Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the aforesaid request of the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to apply for anticipatory bail/ bail as permissible under law and in accordance with law.
It is made clear that we have not expressed any opinion on merits of the case of the petitioner.
Order Date :- 20.7.2021 Amit Mishra
Digitally signed by Justice Surya Digitally signed by Justice Piyush Prakash Kesarwani Agrawal Date: 2021.07.20 17:13:23 IST Date: 2021.07.20 17:14:07 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad
Mohd. Shamim
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
