Petitioners challenged an order. Respondent's counsel stated a charge sheet was filed, rendering the petition infructuous. Court dismissed the petition without addressing merits.
Written petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 46
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3952 of 2021
Petitioner :- Kamlesh Singh And 2 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd Sarwar Khan Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.,Anil Kumar Tiwari,Pushpendra Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Surya Prakash Kesarwani,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard Mohd. Sarwar Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri Pushpendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant-respondent and Shri Patanjali Mishra, learned AGA for the State - respondent.
Learned counsel for the informant - respondent has stated before us that charge sheet no. 01 dated 17.06.2021 has been filed in the case and therefore, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the aforesaid question.
In view of the aforesaid and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 20.7.2021 Amit Mishra
Digitally signed by Justice Surya Digitally signed by Justice Piyush Prakash Kesarwani Agrawal Date: 2021.07.20 17:13:18 IST Date: 2021.07.20 17:14:02 IST Reason: Document Owner Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Allahabad
Kamlesh Singh And 2 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Surya Prakash Kesarwani
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
