The Court dismissed the civil revision as being infructuous after the revisionist's counsel made a statement to that effect.
Revision dismissed on the grounds of being infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 69
Case :- CIVIL REVISION No. - 156 of 2012
Revisionist :- Sharad Kumar Khanna Opposite Party :- Smt.Hansa Devi And And Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Amit Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Komal Mehrotra,Pranab Kumar Ganguli
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the present revision has become infructuous in view of the statement made the revision is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
Order Date :- 28.10.2021 Neetu
Sharad Kumar Khanna
Smt. Hansa Devi
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
