Iliyas Nat v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application rejected as the applicant is not a fit case due to gravity of accusations and recovery of 27 cows from his truck.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail rejected; order dated 27.10.2021.
What the court decided
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 13722 of 2021
Applicant :- Iliyas Nat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jagadish Prasad Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shekhar Kumar Yadav,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Applicant- Iliyas Nat seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 119 of 2021, under Sections of 3/5-A/8 U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and 11 Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, P.S. Gopiganj, District Bhadohi.
As per the allegations made in the FIR, it is alleged that from the truck, which is said to be owned by the applicant, 27 cow cattle has been recovered.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive.
Per contra, learned AGA has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail and has submitted that 27 cow cattle has been recovered from the truck of the applicant, as such, no case for anticipatory bail is made out.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is a fit case for the grant of anticipatory bail in the present proceedings?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Iliyas Nat
Coram
Shekhar Kumar Yadav
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/13722/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court