In a contempt application, the applicant sought directions to initiate proceedings for wilful disobedience of a 2003 order by the Deputy Director of Consolidation. The court found that no prima facie case for contempt was made out.
The contempt application was dismissed as no case for contempt was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2982 of 2011
Applicant :- Smt. Girija Devi And Others Opposite Party :- Manoj Kumar And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Aditya,Chandra Dutt Counsel for Opposite Party :- S.C.,Anil Pratap Singh,Brajesh Kumar Gautam
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
The applicant is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the judgement and order dated 03.12.2003 passed by Deputy Director of Consolidation, Varanasi (Annexure -5 to the affidavit).
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
From perusal of the record, Court is of the opinion that no case for contempt is made out as on date.
Accordingly, present contempt application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 Pramod Tripathi
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a prima facie case for contempt of court is made out against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of a judgment dated 03.12.2003.
Smt. Girija Devi And Others
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
