In this contempt application, the applicant sought directions to initiate proceedings for wilful disobedience of a writ court order. However, it was informed that the order had already been complied with, resulting in no surviving cause of action.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 100 of 2019
Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad Opposite Party :- Anand Prakash Sharma Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Wajid Ali Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ram Bilas Yadav
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard Ms. Ishrat Jahan, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Syed Wajid Ali, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ram Bilas Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party.
The applicant is before this Court for a direction to initiate contempt proceeding against the opposite party for wilful disobedience of the judgement and order dated 20.03.2018 passed in Writ A No.6242 of 2016 (Irshad Ahmad Vs. State of U.P. and 2 others) passed in terms of directions given in Writ A No.6004 of 2016 (Sartaj Ahmad and 5 others Vs. State of U.P. and others).
Today when the matter is taken up, it is informed by learned counsel for the parties that the order passed by the writ court has already been complied with, therefore, no cause of action remained survive.
In view of the same, the present contempt application is dismissed.
Order Date :- 12.8.2021 Pramod Tripathi
Irshad Ahmad
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
