Vijay Pal v. Ravinder Kumar, D.M. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Court dismissed a contempt application as infructuous because the involved Writ Court order had been complied with by the opposite party.
Court dismissed a contempt application as infructuous because the involved Writ Court order had been complied with by the opposite party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 206 of 2021
Applicant :- Vijay Pal Opposite Party :- Ravinder Kumar, D.M. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- I.P. Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ayub Khan
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned counsel for opposite party.
The applicant has preferred the present contempt petition for non-compliance of the judgment and order dated 24.09.2019 passed in Writ B No. 2262 of 2019 (Vijay Pal Vs. Deputy Director of Consolidation and 4 Others).
Today when the matter was taken up learned counsel for applicant argued that order passed by Writ Court has been complied with, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt application.
The present contempt application is dismissed having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 16.8.2021 Ujjawal
Vijay Pal
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court