Vipin Bhat v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order granting bail to Vipin Bhat under NDPS Act who alleged false implication, requiring personal bond and two local sureties with standard conditions.
What did the court decide?
Applicant released on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of like amount.
What the court decided
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4126 of 2021
Applicant :- Vipin Bhat Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Raj Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Ram Raj Pandey, learned Counsel for the applicant and Smt. Seema Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is wholly innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is also submitted that the alleged contraband has not been recovered from the possession of the applicant. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery. It is further submitted that the co-accused Roshan has been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.12.2020 passed in Criminal Mic. Bail Application No. 45892 of 2020. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and in case, the applicant is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. The applicant is in jail since 29.5.2020.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the aforesaid facts.
Perused the first information report as well as the averments made in the bail application.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be granted bail in the narcotics case.
If so, what conditions should be imposed on the grant of bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Vipin Bhat
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Vivek Varma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/4126/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court