Allowed

Mubarak Ali v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC25 Jan 2021BAIL/4125/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this criminal miscellaneous bail application, this court discharged the applicant, Mubarak Ali, from jail on bail for his alleged involvement in a case under the U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities Act, subject to furnishing a personal bond and sureties and adhering to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Applicant released on bail with a personal bond and two local sureties of similar amount.

Mubarak Ali Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4125 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Mubarak Ali Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mirza Ali Zulfaqar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Mirza Ali Zulfaqar, learned Counsel for the applicant and Sri Smt. Seema Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents.

¶6

It is contended by learned Counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart one case has been shown against the applicant and in the said case he has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 15.12.2020 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 40346 of 2020, photo copy of bail order is annexed as Annexure-5 to the affidavit. It is further submitted that the applicant is neither a member of any gang nor a gang leader and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive and is in jail since 22.10.2020. In case, he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Perused the first information report as well as the averments made in the bail application.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant Mubarak Ali involved in case crime no.427 of 2020, under Section 3(1) of U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Tarya Sujan, District Kushinagar be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that:

¶10

the applicant shall not temper with the prosecution evidence.

¶11

the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness;

¶12

the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶13

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the order granting bail shall automatically be vacated.

¶14

Order Date :- 25.1.2021 S.S.

Mubarak Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mubarak Ali v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lavkush and Another Vs State of Up

Babloo and Another Vs State of U.P.

Rishi Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Zakir Husain Vs State of U.P.

Vipin Bhat Vs State of U.P.

Vipin Sharma @ Vipin Vs State of U.P.