Allowed

Ravi Parihar (Khangar) v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2021BAIL/4099/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application seeks release for an applicant accused under the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities Act. The court releases the applicant on personal bond and sureties subject to conditions against tampering with evidence or pressurizing witnesses.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond and two local sureties subject to conditions not to tamper with evidence or witnesses and to appear in court.

Ravi Parihar (Khangar) Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 79 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4099 of 2021

¶2

Applicant :- Ravi Parihar (Khangar) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State respondent.

¶5

It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart, copy of which has been filed as annexure-2 to the affidavit, the applicant is shown to have involved in three cases. It is next contended that in the aforesaid cases the applicant has already been enlarged on bail, copies of which are filed as annexure-3, 4 and 5 to the affidavit. It is further contended that the applicant is neither member of any gang nor gang leader and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is also contended that the applicant is in jail since 19.11.2020 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶7

Perused the first information report as well as the averments made in the application.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant Ravi Parihar (Khangar), involved in case crime no. 307 of 2020 under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, P.S. Babina district Jhansi be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that :

¶9

the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶10

the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

¶11

the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶12

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the order granting bail shall automatically be vacated. Order Date :- 20.1.2021/Ashish

Ravi Parihar (Khangar) v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravi Parihar (Khangar) v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Ram Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shaukeen Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Nadeem Vs State of U.P.

Nafis @ Laddu Vs State of U.P.

Shoaib @ Kala Vs State of U.P.

Sattar Vs State of U.P.