Allowed

Shoaib @ Kala v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2021BAIL/4096/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hearing a criminal bail application under the U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, the court released the applicant on bail subject to a personal bond and two local sureties, with specific conditions regarding evidence and witness conduct.

What did the court decide?

Releasing the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties with specified conditions.

Shoaib @ Kala Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4096 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Shoaib @ Kala Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Satish Kumar Tyagi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Satish Kumar Tyagi, learned Counsel for the applicant and Smt. Seema Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State respondents.

¶6

It is contended by learned Counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart four cases have been shown against the applicant and in the said cases he has been granted bail, photo copy of bail orders have been collectively annexed as Annexure-2 to the affidavit filed in support of bail application. It is further submitted that the applicant is neither a member of any gang nor a gang leader and he has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive and is in jail since 3.9.2020 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Perused the first information report as well as the averments made in the bail application.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also perusing the material on record, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, let the applicant Shoaib @ Kala involved in case crime/F.I.R. no.0794 of 2020, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Murad Nagar, District Ghaziabad be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that:

¶10

the applicant shall not temper with the prosecution evidence.

¶11

the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness;

¶12

the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.

¶13

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the order granting bail shall automatically be vacated.

¶14

Order Date :- 20.1.2021 S.S.

Shoaib @ Kala v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shoaib @ Kala v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri Ram Vs State of U.P. and Another

Shaukeen Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Nadeem Vs State of U.P.

Ravi Parihar (Khangar) Vs State of U.P.

Nafis @ Laddu Vs State of U.P.

Sattar Vs State of U.P.