Allowed

Mohit @ Sunny Bhadauriya v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Apr 2021BAIL/13781/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed bail to an accused in an IPC case following a supplementary affidavit. The court found it a fit case for bail without commenting on merits; conditions for personal bond and sureties were issued.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail with personal bond and two reliable sureties on conditions not to indulge in criminal activity, tamper with evidence, or pressure witnesses.

Mohit @ Sunny Bhadauriya Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 86

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13781 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Mohit @ Sunny Bhadauriya Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ghan Shyam Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Subhash Chand,J.

¶5

Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant. The same is taken on record.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for applicant(s), learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

This bail application has been preferred by the accusedapplicant(s), Mohit @ Sunny Bhaduariya, who is involved in Case Crime No. 358 of 2020, under Sections 392, 504, 411 I.P.C. P.S.- Kotwali Nagar, District- Banda .

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant(s) in support of his prayer for bail submits that F.I.R of this case crime was lodged against three unknown persons under Section 392, 504 I.P.C. in regard to loot of Rs. 3000/- in cash and one mobile. The police party apprehended the applicant and Rishabh on 25.05.2020. From the possession of the applicant one mobile and Rs. 500/- are alleged to be recovered. There is no independent witness of the alleged recovery which has been falsely implanted. The applicant has been languishing in jail since 26.05.2020. The criminal antecedent of the applicant has been explained in para 11 of the affidavit filed in support of this bail application.

¶9

On behalf of State bail has been opposed.

¶10

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by learned counsel for both sides and going through the record, without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail.

¶11

Let applicant(s), Mohit @ Sunny Bhadauriya, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(i) The applicant(s) shall not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶13

(ii) The applicant(s) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.

¶14

(iii) The applicant(s) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.

¶15

(iv) The applicant(s) shall regularly appear on the dates fixed by the trial court unless his personal attendance is exempted by the trial court.

¶16

In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, liberty is given to the trial court to cancel the bail of the applicant(s) without any reference to this Court.

¶17

Order Date :- 5.4.2021 PS

Mohit @ Sunny Bhadauriya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohit @ Sunny Bhadauriya v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jyoti Vs State of U.P.

Abhay Vs State of U.P.

Abhay Vs State of U.P.

Naveendhar Dubey Vs State of U.P.

Rajveer Vs State of U.P.

Savej Vs State of U.P.