The Court allowed the application for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, based on the proposed arbitrator's consent.
Appointment of Mr. Justice Arvind Kumar Tripathi as arbitrator; expenses to be borne equally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 2
Case :- ARBITRATION AND CONCILI. APPL.U/S11(4) No. - 55 of 2021
Applicant :- M/S Anandilal Lalpuria Opposite Party :- U.P. Jal Nigam And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Uma Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Pranjal Mehrotra
Hon'ble Suneet Kumar,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Pursuant to the order passed on 31.8.2021, the proposed arbitrator has given his consent in terms of Section 11 (8) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to act as an arbitrator.
Accordingly, Mr. Justice Arvind Kumar Tripathi, a retired Judge of this Court, R/0 AD-6, EkankiKunj, ADA Colony, Muir Road, Rajapur, Allahabad, Mobile No. 9415253690, is appointed arbitrator to enter upon the reference, and adjudicate the dispute in accordance with provisions of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The arbitrator shall be entitled to fees, in accordance with the provisions of fourth schedule inserted by Act No. 3 of 2016. The expenses shall be borne equally by the parties.
The application under Section 11 of the Act thus, stands allowed.
Order Date :- 4.10.2021 S.Prakash
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to appoint an arbitrator upon consent in terms of Section 11(8).
2 provisions across 1 enactments
M/S Anandilal Lalpuria
U.P. Jal Nigam
Suneet Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
