Allowed

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Mar 2021ABAIL/1080/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted interim anticipatory bail to two applicants in a case involving alleged sexual offences and cheating. Bail was granted for 30 days or until cognizance, subject to standard conditions including furnishing a bond and ensuring cooperation with police investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for 30 days or until cognizance, subject to personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties and compliance with standard bail conditions.

Sachin and Another Vs State of U.P. — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1080 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Sachin And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pushpendra Singh,Wahid Jamal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Sachin and Deepak , with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No. 210 of 2020 , under Sections263,376,506,120-B I.P.C., and section 3/4 POCSO Act Police Station- Lodha, DistrictAligarh , during pendency of trial.

¶7

The applicants are on interim anticipatory by order dated 20.1.2021

¶8

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused persons, they deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of 30 days or till the cognizance is taken by the Magistrate on the police report submitted u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court,whichever is earlier, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/ concerned Court, subject to the following conditions :-

¶9

(i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required;

¶10

(ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court

¶11

or to any police officer;

¶12

(iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passports, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶13

(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶14

(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶15

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.

¶16

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation, if pending, of the present case in accordance with law, expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.

¶17

The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, if investigation is in progress, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶18

Order Date :- 18.3.2021 Atul kr. sri.

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tinku Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Kumar Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P.

Harsh Tiwari @ Shivam and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Shabnam Vs State of U.P. and Another

Subhash and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aman @ Aman Kumar Vs State of U.P.