Allowed

Subhash and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC18 Mar 2021ABAIL/4274/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to five applicants in a criminal case involving offences under I.P.C. Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 506. Bail was granted for 45 days or until cognizance on the police report, subject to standard conditions including availability for interrogation, non-interference with witnesses, and permission to travel domestically.

What did the court decide?

Grant of anticipatory bail for 45 days or until cognizance on police report; personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties in the like amount directed to be furnished.

Subhash and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4274 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Subhash And 5 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vishwa Nath Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A for the State.

¶6

The instant anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants, Subhash, Ashok, Barphha Devi, Safiqun Nisha Imtiyaz Ali and Munsrim, with a prayer to release them on bail in Case Crime No.0554 of 2020, under Sections-419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 506 I.P.C., Police Station-Hata, District-Kushinagar, during pendency of trial.

¶7

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused persons, they deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail for a period of 45 days or till the cognizance is taken by the Magistrate on the police report submitted u/s 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court, whichever is earlier, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/ concerned Court subject to the following conditions :-

¶8

(i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by the police officer as and when required;

¶9

(ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶10

(iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passports, the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.

¶11

(iv) The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.

¶12

(v) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.

¶13

In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer/Govt. Advocate is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.

¶14

The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation, if pending, of the present case in accordance with law, expeditiously, independently without being prejudiced by any observations made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail

¶15

application of the applicants.

¶16

The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Court before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, if investigation is in progress, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.

¶17

Order Date :- 18.3.2021 SS

Subhash and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subhash and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tinku Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Kumar Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P.

Harsh Tiwari @ Shivam and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Smt. Shabnam Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aman @ Aman Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Laxmishankar Srivastava Vs State of U.P.