The applicant claimed to be a minor but was unrepresented. The court held that an anticipatory bail application filed by a minor without representation is not maintainable and dismissed the application.
Application dismissed; applicant allowed to file appropriate application if advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3525 of 2021
Applicant :- Tinku Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is minor but he has not been represented by anyone. He has preferred the anticipatory bail application on his own which is not maintainable.
It is accordingly dismissed.
However, the applicant may file appropriate application, if so advised.
Order Date :- 17.3.2021 KS
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an anticipatory bail application filed by a person representing themselves without being a minor is maintainable if the applicant claims to be a minor?
Tinku
Siddharth,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
