The Hon'ble Court rejected the anticipatory bail application. It observed that the allegations of collusion in extorting money are serious factual claims requiring proper investigation, making it difficult to exercise discretion in the applicant's favor at this stage.
Application dismissed. Applicant left to approach court for regular bail later.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10258 of 2021
Applicant :- Salman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 15.6.2021 Abhilash
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant facing prosecution for alleged extortion.
Whether the applicant was falsely implicated based on animosity with the main accused.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Salman
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
