Court granted anticipatory bail to applicants accused of offences under Section 379 and 506 IPC, characterizing the matter as a family dispute without criminal antecedents.
Anticipatory bail granted till conclusion of trial on personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- each with two sureties upon specified conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9194 of 2021
Applicant :- Sandhya Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vijay Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
(i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required.
(ii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court.
(iv) In default of any of the conditions mentioned above, the investigating officer shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.
Order Date :- 14.6.2021 AHA
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicants accused of offences under Section 379 and 506 IPC in a family dispute context?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandhya Devi
Ganesh Chaurasiya
State of U.P.
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
