The Court rejected an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for the applicants, holding that since no regular bail had been granted to them, the discretion could not be exercised on the basis of bail granted to a co-accused.
Application rejected; applicants directed to apply for regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 38
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10252 of 2021
Applicant :- Santosh Dixit And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ansar Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Order Date :- 15.6.2021 Abhilash
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicants considering the regular bail granted to the co-accused.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Dixit and Anil Kumar
Saumitra Dayal Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
