High Court Court of Allahabad addressed a quashing application under Section 482 CrPC. It held that no interim application would be allowed as the issue of material absences requires a trial court trial.
Order quashed and remanded to the trial court for trial. Application for interim stay of future proceedings was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8132 of 2021
Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Dwivedi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Sajiwan Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
vkosnd dh vksj ls /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 0935 lu 2019] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 506 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk& pdsjh] ftyk dkuiqj uxj ls mn~Hkwr okn la0 14701 lu 2020] tks eq[; U;kf;d eftLVzsV] dkuiqj uxj ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS] ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd ds fo:) xyr izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ vafdr djk;h x;h gS rFkk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa fy[kk;h x;h ckrsa fujk/kkj gSa] vkosnd ds fo:) mijksDr /kkjkvksa ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k ugha curk gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd og izkFkZuk [k.M esa dh xbZ vU; izkFkZukvksa ij ncko ugha Mkyuk pkgrs gSa] cfYd voj U;k;ky; esa mUekspu izkFkZuk i= nkf[ky djus dh vuqefr pkgrs gSa rFkk muds }kjk nkf[ky fd, x, mUekspu izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k djus dk] lacaf/kr voj U;k;ky; dks funsZ’k fn;k tk;A
eSaus mHk;i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkj fd;kA
mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkvksa ds rdksZ ij fopkjksijkUr ,oa vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls bl Lrj ij ;g ugha dgk tk ldrk gS fd vkosnd ds f[kykQ mijksDr /kkjkvksa ds vUrxZr dksbZ vijk/k xfBr ugha gksrk gSA vkosnd dh vksj ls tks rdZ izLrqr fd, x, gSa os fookfnr rkfF;d iz’u ls lacaf/kr gSa] ftuds fo"k; esa bl U;k;ky; }kjk /kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vkosnu i= ij dksbZ QSlyk nsuk laHko ugha gS] pwWfd mDr rkfF;d iz’uksa dk fofu’p; fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk gh lk{; vkus ds ckn fd;k tk ldrk gSA bl laca/k esa ekuuh; mPpre U;k;ky; }kjk R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1960 SC 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P. Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cri.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another, (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cri.) 283 esa fn, x, fu.kZ;ksa esa ;g vo/kkfjr fd;k x;k gS fd bl Lrj ij dsoy izFke n`"V;k gh dsl ns[kk tkuk gSA eqyfteku dk tks fookfnr cpko dFku gS ml ij bl Lrj ij fopkj ugha fd;k tk ldrk gSA rn~uqlkj ;g vkosnu i= cyghu gS vkSj fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
gkyWkfd ;fn vkosnd vkt ls 1 ekg dh le;kof/k esa] lEcfU/kr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k vius vf/koDrk ds ek/;e ls bl vkns'k dh izekf.kr izfrfyfi ds lkFk mUekspu izkFkZuki= nkf[ky djrs gSa rks lacaf/kr U;k;ky; }kjk mHk; i{k dks lqudj] U;k;ksfpr vkns'k ds ek/;e ls mldk fuLrkj.k /kkjk 244 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr miyC/k lk{; ds vk/kkj ij izkFkfedrk ds vk/kkj ij 'kh/kzrkiwoZd fd;k tk;A ;fn v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vkosndx.k ds fo:) vkjksi fojfpr djus dk fu.kZ; ysrk gS rks ml fLFkfr esa og vkjksi fojfpr fd, tkus dh frfFk ij vkosnd dks O;fDrxr :i ls mifLFkr gksus ds fy, funsZf'kr dj ldrk gS vkSj ml frfFk ij mlls tekurukes eWkx ldrk gSA
vkt ls 30 fnu ds vUnj vFkok vkosnd ds lEcfU/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr [email protected] djds fueqZfDr vkosnu i= izLrqr djus esa] tks Hkh igys gks] vkosnd ds fo:) dksbZ izihM+d dk;Zokgh ugha dh tk,xhA ;fn vkosnd dh vksj ls 30 fnu ds vUnj voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj fueqZfDr izkFkZuk i= izLrqr ugha fd;k tkrk rks og bl vkns’k }kjk iznRr vuqrks"k dk ykHk izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh ugha gksxk rFkk mlds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj vko’;d izihM+d dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gSA
mDr funsZ'kksa ds lkFk ;g izkFkZuki= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 3&9&2021 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a quashing order under Section 482 CPC can be made at the intermediate stage when the registry notes cite earlier orders.
Whether the application should be sent to the trial court for adjudication or disposed of in court.
What are the time limits and consequences for the applicant to appear in court for the quashing application.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Santosh Kumar Dwivedi
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
