Allowed

Mohd Faruk and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC3 Sept 2021A482/6940/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted a stay period. The applicant requested further time to approach the High Court. The Hon'ble Court allowed a stay of up to 30 days for moving the High Court or mutating the case, treating the order as a direction to the applicant accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Granted a stay of up to 30 days to approach the High Court or file the case as directed.

Mohd Faruk and Another Vs State of U.P. and… — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Allahabad HC (2021)

¶1

Court No. - 85

¶2

Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6940 of 2021

¶3

Applicant :- Mohd Faruk And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

/kkjk 482 na0iz0la0 ds vUrxZr ;g vkosnu i=] eq0v0la0 0196 lu 2020] vUrxZr /kkjk 323] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3 (1) (da) (dha) ,l0lh0@,l0Vh0 ,sDV] Fkkuk ckcwx<+] ftyk uSuh] ftyk iz;kxjkt esa izsf"kr vkjksi i= la0 214@2020] fnukafdr 25&4&2020 ls mn~Hkwr Lis’ku ls’ku Vzk;y ua0 188 lu 2020] tks Lis’ky tt] ,l0lh0@,0Vh0 ,sDV] bykgkckn ds U;k;ky; esa yfEcr gS rFkk blesa ikfjr izlaKku vkns’k fn0 2&12&2020 ds fo:) nk;j fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj'khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosndx.k ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us izdj.k ij nh?kZdky rd cgl djus ds mijkUr vuqjks/k fd;k fd os vkosnu i= dh vU; izkFkZuk ij cy ugha nsuk pkgrs rFkk bl Lrj ij dsoy ;g vuqjks/k dj jgs gSa fd vkosndx.k ds tekur vkosnu i= dk Rofjr fuLrkj.k vejkorh o ,d vU; cuke mRrj izns’k jkT; 2004 ,0,y0vkj0 290 (57) esa ikfjr vkns’k rFkk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk yky deysUnz izrki flag cuke mRrj izns’k jkT; 2009 (3) ,0Mh0ts0 322 (,l0lh0) esa izfrikfjr fl)kUrksa ds vuq:i dj fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks mudk ;g vuqjks/k Lohdkj fd, tkus esa dksbZ vkifRr ugha gSA

¶9

mHk; i{k ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k ds rdZ lquus rFkk i=koyh dk lE;d~ voyksdu djus ds mijkUr bl U;k;ky; dk ;g er gS fd ekeys ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa ds vkyksd esa ;g izkfo/kkfur fd;k tkrk gS fd ;fn vkosndx.k vkt ls 30 fnu dh le;kof/k esa] lEcfU/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj vkReleiZ.k djrs gSa rFkk tekur izkFkZuki= izLrqr djrs gSa rks muds tekur izkFkZuk i= dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrkiwoZd fu;eksa ds vuq:i fd;k tk;sxkA

¶10

mDr ds lEcU/k esa ;g Hkh Li"V fd;k tkrk gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks ;g vkns’k vkosndx.k dks tekur nsus gsrq ck/; ugha djrk oju v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vkosndx.k ds tekur izkFkZuki= dks mlds xq.k&nks"k ds vk/kkj ij fuLrkj.k djus gsrq Lora= gSA

¶11

vkt ls 30 fnu ds vUnj vFkok vkosndx.k ds lEcfU/kr voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr [email protected] djds tekur vkosnu i= izLrqr djus esa] tks Hkh igys gks] vkosndx.k ds fo:) dksbZ izih + M+d dk;Zokgh ugha dh tk,xhA ;fn vkosndx.k dh vksj ls 30 fnu ds vUnj voj U;k;ky; ds le{k mifLFkr gksdj tekur izkFkZuk i= izLrqr ugha fd;k tkrk rks os bl vkns’k }kjk

¶12

iznRr vuqrks"k dk ykHk izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ugha gkasxs rFkk muds fo:) fu;ekuqlkj vko’;d izihM+d dk;Zokgh dh tk ldrh gSA

¶13

mDr funsZ’kksa ds lkFk ;g izkFkZuki= vfUre :i ls fuLrkfjr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶14

fn0 % 3&9&2021 ds0lh0flag

¶15

2 of 2

Mohd Faruk and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Faruk and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subham @ Jitendra and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nihad @ Babloo and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Pal Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. and Another

Santosh Kumar Dwivedi Vs State of U.P. and Another

Jane Ali @ Gattu and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Riya Chaudhary Vs State of U.P. and Another