Subham @ Jitendra and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking to quash an order rejecting a quashing plea in a POCSO case involving rape allegations. The court found no merit to interfere as the impugned order was reasoned and did not exhibit perversity or abuse of process.
What did the court decide?
The application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the impugned order was dismissed.