The High Court dismissed an intra-court application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed in 2007 for want of prosecution due to the lapse of over 13 years and lack of party presence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 93
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 28191 of 2007
Applicant :- Shradhanand And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajeev Chaddha Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sameer Jain,J.
List has been revised. None present on behalf of the applicants to press the present application. Learned A.G.A. for the Staterespondent is present.
The present application is of the year 2007. More than 13 years have already been elapsed.
It appears that by efflux of time, either the parties have lost their interest or the matter has become infructuous.
In view thereof, the present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
In case, if cause of action still survives, then applicants may approach this Court to recall this order.
Order Date :- 16.12.2021 AK Pandey
Shradhanand And Others
State of U.P.
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
