The applicant failed to appear to press the application. The court dismissed the application for want of prosecution and vacated a prior interim order citing a Supreme Court judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 59
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10961 of 2007
Applicant :- Dr. Jagdish Mittal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- G.S.Hajela,Amitabh Agarwal Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
List revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
Accordingly, this application stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order dated 18.05.2007 stood vacated in view of the judgment passed by Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Asian Re-surfacing of Road Agency Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation 2018 (16) S.C.C. 299.
Order Date :- 3.12.2021 SK Goswami
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Asian Re-surfacing of Road Agency Vs. Central Bureau of InvestigationReferred¶7
Asian Re-surfacing of Road Agency Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation 2018 (16) S.C.C. 299 · Who else cites this
Dr. Jagdish Mittal
State of U.P.
Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
