The High Court dismissed a bail application under Section 482 CrPC for want of prosecution, stating the cause of action may have expired or the matter is infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 58
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 11553 of 2008
Applicant :- Harish Chandra And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Ashutosh Srivastava,J.
No one appears for the applicants even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A. is present.
The matter pertains to the year 2008. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action is no more surviving or for any other reason matter has been rendered infructuous. Consequently, no one is appearing to press this application.
In view of above, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands discharged.
However, it is provided that if the cause of action still survives, the applicants are at liberty to move appropriate application for recall of the order.
Office is directed to communicate the order to the court concerned.
Order Date :- 16.12.2021 Vandana
Harish Chandra And Others
Ashutosh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
