Application under Section 482 CrPC was treated as old and pending since 2008. The court dismissed it as infructuous and for want of prosecution due to lack of appearance.
Application dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 26601 of 2007
Applicant :- Ravindra Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- D.S.Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Case called out. No one appears to press this application even in the revised call.
Learned AGA is present for the State-Respondents.
The matter is very old and is pending since 2008. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action no more survives or for any other reason, the matter has rendered infructuous, that is why none is present to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to intimate the Trial Court concerned about this order within a period of one month.
Order Date :- 4.12.2021 Siddhant
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravindra Yadav
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
