In proceedings for application under Section 482 CrPC filed in 2008, the High Court dismissed the application as infructuous and for want of prosecution, noting no appearance by the applicant.
Application dismissed as infructuous and for want of prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 36367 of 2008
Applicant :- Shailendra Tiwari And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pankaj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Case called out. No one appears to press this application even in the revised call.
Learned AGA is present for the State-Respondents.
The matter is very old and is pending since 2008. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action no more survives or for any other reason, the matter has rendered infructuous, that is why none is present to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to intimate the Trial Court concerned about this order within a period of one month.
Order Date :- 3.12.2021 Siddhant
Shailendra Tiwari
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
