Court dismissed an unpressed application under Section 482 CrPC as infructuous and for want of prosecution after prolonged delay without appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 92
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 20968 of 2008
Applicant :- Taufiq And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt.Advocate
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one has put in appearance to press the application. Sri Sati Shankar, learned State Law Officer is present for State.
The matter is very old and is pending since 2008. It appears that by efflux of time either cause of action no more survives or for any other reason, the matter has been rendered infructuous. That is why none is present to press this application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as infructuous as well as for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Office is directed to inform the trial court concerned about this order within a month.
Order Date :- 3.12.2021
Shalini
Taufiq And Others
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
