Dismissed
Rajendra Singh and Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Allahabad HCA482/16686/2008
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16686 of…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16686 of…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16686 of 2008
Applicant :- Rajendra Singh And Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- R.N. Sharma,Atul Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Case called out in revised list. No one is present on behalf of applicants to press this application. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
The matter is an old one pending since 2008.
It is well settled that powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India cannot be exercised where the allegations are required to be proved in Court of law. Inherent powers under Article 226 of Constitution of India could be exercised by the High Court either to prevent abuse of the process of any Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice.
It appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the applicants have lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for applicants is absent.
However, I have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that the applicants are not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
In view of the above, the present application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 8.12.2021
RPD
Rajendra Singh And Others
HON'BLE GAUTAM CHOWDHARY,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court