A defective criminal revision filed in February 2022 was dismissed for want of prosecution as defects remained unrectified after listing was revised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 235 of 2021
Revisionist :- Arif Ateeq Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Revisionist :- Mohammad Asif,Nasim Uddin Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Gautam Chowdhary,J.
List is revised.
None appears for the revisionist.
Perusal of the record it transpires that that this defective revision has been filed in February, 2022, but the defects has not been removed so far.
Accordingly, it is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 7.12.2021 RPD
Arif Ateeq
State Of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
