The court dismissed the writ petition against private respondents, declining to interfere under writ jurisdiction at this stage and leaving the petitioner to seek civil remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7570 of 2020
Petitioner :- Vijendra Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pavan Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Dass, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State.
The petitioner is seeking remedy against respondents- 6 and 7, who are private respondents.
We leave it open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available to him under the civil law.
We are not inclined to interfere in the matter under the writ jurisdiction, at this stage.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.3.2020 Rahul Dwivedi/-
Vijendra Singh
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
