The petitioner's counsel stated that the prayers in the writ petition had been answered. The Single Judge dismissed the petition as infructuous without engaging in detailed reasoning.
The writ petition was dismissed as having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 5818 of 2020
Petitioner :- Israil Shah Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anant Ram Dube Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Sri A. R. Dube, learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the prayers made in the petition have been answered. Hence, the writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous.
This writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.3.2020 S.P.
Israil Shah
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
