The High Court dismissed a writ petition where the petitioner alleged a personal family matter against a relative. The Court held that such disputes are personal in nature and left the petitioner to seek remedies under civil law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7458 of 2020
Petitioner :- Mahendra Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Dass, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for State.
The petitioner has allegation against relative in his family, which is personal in nature.
We leave it open to the petitioner to take recourse to the remedy available to him under the civil law.
We are not inclined to interfere in the matter under the writ jurisdiction, at this stage.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.3.2020 Rahul Dwivedi/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should interfere in a personal family allegation under writ jurisdiction.
Mahendra
State Of U.P.
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
