Dismissed
Shreshtha Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/43193/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Court held that since the petitioner has an alternative and efficacious statutory remedy under Rule 78 of the U.P. Mines and Minerals Concession Rules, 1963, it is not inclined to interfere with the order rejecting the stay application. The petitioner was directed to exhaust the statutory remedy.
What did the court decide?
Disallowance of intervening in the stay application; direction to exhaust statutory remedy under Rule 78.