This judgment dismisses a writ petition in default as none of the parties appeared to press arguments. The petition is dismissed with any interim order vacated. No substantive ruling is recorded in this short order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 35
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 9630 of 2019
Petitioner :- Yogendra Kumar Respondent :- State Information Officer And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kashif Gilani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kunal Ravi Singh
Hon'ble Bharati Sapru,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
List revised.
None appears to press the writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed in default. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 22.1.2020 pks
Yogendra Kumar
State Information Officer
Bharati Sapru
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
