Writ petition dismissed on grounds of availability of alternative statutory remedy under Clause 6.10 of Electricity Supply Code, 2005. Petitioner did not appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 22547 of 2020
Petitioner :- Ram Murat Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Mahboob Ahmad
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
The case has been called out. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner.
Sri Narendra Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondentDepartment is present.
It is pointed out that the grievances raised by the petitioner herein can be addressed, in case the representation is made under the Clause 6.10 of the Electricity Supply Code, 2005.
The writ petition is dismissed on the ground of availability of alternative statutory remedy to the petitioner.
Order Date :- 15.12.2020 P Kesari
Ram Murat
State Of U.P.
2 Others
Sunita Agarwal
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
