Disposed
Aditya Kumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWRIC/22058/2020
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In Writ C No. 22058 of 2020, the Court observed that since the petitioner disputed the electricity bill and approached the disaster, the respondent must decide expeditiously. Connection restoration depends on bill clearance unless a dispute exists.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Executive Engineer to take an expeditious decision regarding the pending dispute over the electricity bill.