Pramod Kumar v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17660 of 2020…
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17660 of 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17660 of 2020
Petitioner :- Pramod Kumar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ramesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinav Ojha
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J.
Sri Rakesh Chandra Pathak learned counsel for the respondentDistrict Urban Development Agency (DUDA) submits that the money for construction of house under the scheme of Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna, which was to be released in favour of the petitioner as beneficiary, could not be transferred in his account on the ground of some discrepancy. But, now the same has been corrected and a letter dated 10.10.2020 has been sent to the account department.
The above statement has been made on behalf of the written instructions received by the learned counsel for the respondent.
It seems to us that the grievance raised by the petitioner herein has been addressed at the ends of the Project Officer, District Urban Development Agency (DUDA), Bareilly.
In view of the above, we are not inclined to keep the writ petition pending. The writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the respondent shall do the needful in accordance with law at the earliest.
Order Date :- 23.11.2020 Harshita
Pramod Kumar
State Of U.P.
Sunita Agarwal
Jayant Banerji
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court