Petitioner contended that the writ petition became infructuous post lodging of FIR. The court dismissed the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 17154 of 2020
Petitioner :- Mamta Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Mani Yagyesh Tripathi,Pramod Kumar Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J
At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the F.I.R. has already been lodged against the alleged accused persons , the present writ petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as such.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.11.2020 MLK
Mamta Devi
State Of U.P
Shashi Kant Gupta
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
