Mujahid Husain and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition for maintaining law and order during Moharram was dismissed as infructuous since the relevant period had passed by the time of hearing.
Writ petition for maintaining law and order during Moharram was dismissed as infructuous since the relevant period had passed by the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 15169 of 2020
Petitioner :- Mujahid Husain And 3 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
This writ petition has been filed for maintaining peace, law and order during the period of Moharram, that period is already over and the writ petition has now become infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 1.10.2020 Swati
(Prakash Padia J.) (Abhinava Upadhya J.)
Mujahid Husain And 3 Others
State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Prakash Padia
Abhinava Upadhya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court