Dismissed
Anil Kumar v. Central Administrative Tribunal and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWRIA/8003/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8003 of 2020…
What the court decided
AI extract
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8003 of 2020…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 40
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8003 of 2020
Petitioner :- Anil Kumar
Respondent :- Central Administrative Tribunal And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Om Prakash Yadav,Yashwant Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- Rajnish Kumar Rai
Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J. Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
List of fresh cases has been revised. None is present to press this petition for the petitioner.
Sri Rajnish Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the Railway is present. He submits that the order of tribunal of the year 2008 is under challenged. No explanation has been given for such delay.
However, in absence of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 1.10.2020 Pramod Tripathi
(Prakash Padia,J.) (Abhinava Upadhya,J)
Anil Kumar
Central Administrative Tribunal
Abhinava Upadhya
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court