This order dismisses a writ petition as infructuous because the term of the respondent official had expired by the time of hearing.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 14105 of 2006
Petitioner :- The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secretary Labour Deptt. And Ors. Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashok Kr. Srivastava,Rahul Sahai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the appointment of respondent no. 3 as Commissioner.
The said petition was filed in the year 2006. The term of the respondent no. 3 has come to an end by passage of time.
The writ petition has become infructuous by passage of time, the same is dismissed as having become infructuous.
The interim order is vacated.
Order Date :- 24.2.2020 Puspendra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of appointment has become infructuous due to termination of term by passage of time.
The New India Assurance Company Ltd.
State Of U.P. Thru Principal Secretary Labour Deptt.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
