Manoj Kumar Masih v. the State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Single sentence order allowing the writ petition with no substantive reasoning provided.
What did the court decide?
See connected order Writ C No.13151 of 2008.
Single sentence order allowing the writ petition with no substantive reasoning provided.
See connected order Writ C No.13151 of 2008.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 30
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13153 of 2008
Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Masih Respondent :- The State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Tarun Agrawal,Ravi Kant Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
The writ petition is allowed.
For orders, see my order of date passed in Writ C No.13151 of 2008.
Order Date :- 20.2.2020 Hasnain
Manoj Kumar Masih
The State Of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court