The High Court dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous following the filing of a supplementary affidavit by the petitioners stating no cause survived in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13460 of 2020
Petitioner :- Kapil Misra And Another Respondent :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vineet Sankalp Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Kaushalendra Nath Singh
Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Supplementary affidavit, containing copy of the joint inspection/survey report of representatives and survey report of Tehsildar dated 8.9.2020/9.9.2020, filed by learned counsel for the petitioners is taken on record.
Heard Shri Satish Chandra Mishra and Shri Naveen Sinha, learned Senior Advocates assisted by Shri Vineet Sankalp, learned counsel for the petitioners, Shri M. C. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Advocate/Additional Advocate General for the respondent no. 1 and 2 and Shri Kaushalendra Nath Singh, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2.
While filing the supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioners, it has been stated that no cause survives in the matter and the present petition has become infructuous.
In view of above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. .
Order Date :- 10.9.2020 Ravi Prakash
Kapil Misra
State of U.P.
Shashi Kant Gupta
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
