The High Court disposed of the writ petition holding that the petitioner should approach the concerned authority by filing an application for redressal of grievances, which shall be considered and disposed of expeditiously in accordance with law.
The writ petition stands disposed of finally.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 32
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 12133 of 2020
Petitioner :- Munna Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Praveen Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shashi Kant Gupta,J. Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
This writ petition has been filed, interalia, for the following relief:
" (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding/ directing the respondent no. 3 to decide the representation."
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Balendu Chaturvedi, learned Standing Counsel for the respondents.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, it is provided that for redressal of his grievances, the petitioner may approach the concerned authority by filing an application and if any such application is filed, the authority concerned will consider and dispose of the same
expeditiously in accordance with law.
With the above observation the writ petition stands disposed of finally.
Order Date :- 10.9.2020
MLK
Munna
State Of U.P.
3 Others
Shashi Kant Gupta
Piyush Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
